Newsletters

The European Soil Monitoring Law (Directive), published in the Official Journal on 26 November 2025 and entering into force on 16 December 2025 was presented by Esther Goidts, who is a soil scientist and seconded policy officer at the European Commission. Soils deliver critical ecosystem services—including food and biomass production, water purification, nutrient cycling, carbon sequestration, and biodiversity support—yet most European soils are degraded, with contamination contributing to annual economic costs exceeding €50 billion. The Directive represents a landmark step toward achieving healthy soils across the European Union by 2050. Developed to address widespread soil degradation, the Directive establishes a coherent, integrated framework for monitoring soil health, enhancing resilience, and managing contamination.  

Flanders has developed a practical, science-driven system for setting PFAS limits in soil and excavated materials. This approach carefully balances the protection of human health and the environment with the practical need for soil reuse. The framework was presented by Kaat Touchant and Ingeborg Joris from VITO the Flemish institute for technological research. 

Sweden has taken a proactive, science-based approach to managing PFAS-contaminated sites, particularly those originating from historical use of aqueous film-forming foams (AFFF) at firefighting training areas.  Since 2022, the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has coordinated a governmental assignment, in collaboration with other authorities, to enhance understanding of PFAS pollution and develop effective remediation strategies. This work remains ongoing with several years of funding secured. Niclas Johansson, project manager for the Swedish government’s national initiative on PFAScontaminated sites (RUPFO), shared the project findings during the webinar. 

Australia offers a highly relevant case study of how PFAS contamination challenges conventional approaches to environmental governance and risk assessment. This perspective was presented by Matthew Askeland, Principal Environmental Scientist at ADE Consulting Group, and Karl Bowles, Senior Principal Environmental Scientist at Jacobs and Adjunct Associate Professor at the University of Queensland (QAEHS), both representing ALGA’s Emerging Contaminants of Concern Special Interest Group. 

A new OVAM study explores the possibilities of asocietal cost-benefit analysis (SCBA) for PFAS policy in Flanders, with a focus on the management of PFAS in soil and groundwater. The report maps the challenge, describes economic, health, environmental, and social effects, and applies these to two cases (soil investigation and remediation, and soil excavation and relocation). The study reveals the societal impact of different response options, from doing nothing to full remediation, and highlights which measures deliver the greatest public value, which major knowledge gaps remain, and why cleaning up heavily contaminated sites and preventing new emissions are the most cost-effective strategies. 

More insight on TFA in soil and groundwater on its way upon request of the European Commission.

Microplastics have become widespread across the planet as plastic production continues to rise. Most plastics are not recycled, and nearly 80% ends up in landfills or the environment, where they can break down into small fragments that spread through air, water, and soil. These microplastics come from many everyday sources: synthetic clothing fibres, car tire wear, agricultural films, packaging, sewage sludge, personal care products with microbeads, and even medical waste such as disposable masks.

In several polluted regions, eggs from outdoor foraging chickens were found to contain brominated flame retardants (BFRs), chemicals such as PBDEs (polybrominated diphenyl ethers) and HBCDD (hexabromocyclododecane). These chemicals are often added to plastics, textiles and electronics in order to reduce fire risk. These substances, along with their toxic degradation products, known as polybrominated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans (PBDD/Fs), are known to persist in soil, dust and fragments of discarded materials long after the products themselves are thrown away. Foraging chickens have been found to contain brominated flame retardants (BFRs)dioxins and dibenzofurans (PBDD/Fs).

The Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council (ITRC) has released an updated and expanded version of its PFAS Technical and Regulatory Web Guidance Document (PFAS1), offering its most recent scientific insights, emerging concerns, and practical lessons learned from real-world PFAS projects.  

PFAS are a group of chemicals, used in countless products, from firefighting foams to textiles and industrial applications, and have become widespread in the global environment. As they break down extremely slow, accumulate in living organisms, and have toxic properties, they pose risks to both human health and ecosystems. Addressing the PFAS challenge requires more than isolated measures or quick fixes. Real progress depends on cooperation among scientists, regulators, industries, and communities. To guide these collective efforts, a PFAS roadmap has been developed by a collective of scientists, experts and consultants, consisting of 15 dedicated sections, which are built on three key pillars: